GOVERNANCE AND STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO GLOBAL RANKINGS: EVIDENCE FROM UZBEK UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2025-vol2-iss4-pp499-506Abstract
International university rankings have become strong tools of governance that impact strategic institutional policies and higher education reforms on the global front. In the case of emerging systems like Uzbekistan, rankings are a challenge as well as a chance to be recognized in the world. This paper presents the response of universities in Uzbekistan to the ranking pressures based on interviews with administrators of a public, private, and international branch campus university, and review of national policy documents. The results leave a very clear picture of contrasts between the private and international universities: international branding, autonomy in decision-making, and research incentives are indicators of structured approaches to ranking whereas bureaucratic rigidity, lack of autonomy, and inadequate allocation of resources characterize universities in public. The more important determinant of competitiveness turns out to be governance capacity, not ambition. The paper concludes that to achieve sustainable progress in rankings, reforms to governance are needed that increase autonomy, accountability, and institutional capacity and integrate rankings into larger education, research, and development missions.
Keywords:
governance university rankings institutional competitiveness higher education reform UzbekistanReferences
Depo, G. (2024). The Role & Rule of Rankings. Daedalus, 153(2), pp.286–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_02081.
Downing, K., Loock, P.J. and Gravett, S. (2021). The Impact of Higher Education Ranking Systems on Universities. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002543.
Dowsett, L. (2020). Global university rankings and strategic planning: A case study of Australian institutional performance. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 42(4), pp.1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080x.2019.1701853.
Gupta, M. (2023). Good Governance in India: Challenges and Way Ahead. [online] Social Science Research Network. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4541275.
Hasibuan, S.N. (2022). Special Autonomy in Papua and West Papua: An Overview of Key Issues. Bestuurskunde: Journal of Governmental Studies, 2(2), pp.145–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.53013/bestuurskunde.2.2.145-158.
Holesch, A., Jordana, J., Marx, A. and Schmitt, L. (2025). Inside global governance: perspectives of international organization staff on autonomy and horizontal interactions. Global Public Policy and Governance. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-025-00110-2.
Kaiser, F., Melo, A.I. and Hou, A.Y.C. (2022). Are quality assurance and rankings useful tools to measure ‘new’ policy issues in higher education? The practices in Europe and Asia. European Journal of Higher Education, pp.1–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2022.2094816.
Khamidova, M. and Jibril, A.B. (2024). Drivers of Higher Education Rankings: A Case Study of Uzbekistan. Journal of International Education and Practice, [online] 7(1), pp.41–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.30564/jiep.v7i1.5547.
Kohvakka, M. and Nevala, A. (2023). Rankings and their limits: the role of global university rankings in university mergers in Finland. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 68(1), pp.22–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2023.2204110.
Lex.uz (2020). УП-6079-сон 05.10.2020. Об утверждении Стратегии ‘Цифровой Узбекистан-2030’ и мерах по ее эффективной реализации. [online] Lex.uz. Available at: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/5031048?ONDATE=06.10.2020&ONDATE2=02.04.2021&action=compare [Accessed 25 Jul. 2025].
Lex.uz (2021). PQ-5117-сон 19.05.2021. O‘zbekiston Respublikasida xorijiy tillarni o‘rganishni ommalashtirish faoliyatini sifat jihatidan yangi bosqichga olib chiqish chora-tadbirlari to`g`risida. [online] Lex.uz.
Available at: https://lex.uz/docs/-5426736 [Accessed 24 Jul. 2025].
Siahay, A.Z. and Salle, A. (2025). Autonomy Without Accountability? The Governance Challenges of Papua’s Special Fiscal Regime. International Journal of Economics Development Research (IJEDR), 6(4), pp.1635–1647. doi:https://doi.org/10.37385/ijedr.v6i5.8895.
Stead, D. (2021). Conceptualizing the Policy Tools of Spatial Planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(3), p.088541222199228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412221992283.
Strategy.uz (2022). Development Strategy Center: Action Strategy and Development Strategy: What Are the Differences? [online] Strategy.uz. Available at: https://strategy.uz/index.php?news=1475&lang=en.
Topuniversities.com (2025). Top Universities. [online] Top Universities. Available at: https://www.topuniversities.com/universities/uzbekistan?country=.
Ulibarri, N., Ajibade, I., Galappaththi, E.K., Joe, E.T. and Lesnikowski, A. (2021). A global assessment of policy tools to support climate adaptation. Climate Policy, 22(1), pp.77–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.2002251.
Uzbekistan.org (2019). Reforms In The Higher Education System Of Uzbekistan Aimed At Preparing Competitive Personnel. [online] Uzbekistan.org.ua. Available at: https://www.uzbekistan.org.ua/en/145-biblioteka/7214-reforms-in-the-higher-education-system-of-uzbekistan-aimed-at-preparing-competitive-personnel.html.
Wandercil, M., Calderón, A.I. and Ganga-Contreras, F. (2022). Academic Rankings: implications for university governance of Brazilian Catholic universities. Educação & Realidade, 47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-6236117631vs02.
Wibisono, E. (2024). Regional Governance Challenges in Implementing EU Smart Speciali-zation Policy: A Critical Review. European Journal of Geography, 15(4), pp.281–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.48088/ejg.e.wib.15.4.281.292.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





