XITOY MADANIY KONTEKSTIDA KASBIY QIZIQISHLARNING YANGI NAZARIY QURILISHI: WBCI OLTI O‘LCHOVLI IERARXIK MODELI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2026-vol4-iss4-pp298-306Annotasiya
Kasbiy qiziqishlar nazariyasi uzoq vaqt davomida Hollandning RIASEC modeli hukmronligi ostida rivojlanib keldi. Uning soddaligi, izohlash qulayligi va amaliy foydasi hanuz muhim bo‘lsa-da, mazkur modelning keng toifalari zamonaviy kasbiy tuzilmalardagi va g‘arb bo‘lmagan madaniy muhitlardagi mayda farqlarni tobora kamroq qamrab olmoqda. Ushbu maqolada Xitoy madaniy muhiti va kasbiy ekologiyasini aks ettirish uchun olti birlamchi o‘lchov va o‘n ikki ikkilamchi omildan iborat WBCI olti o‘lchovli ierarxik modeli taklif etiladi. Model an’anaviy tasniflarda ko‘pincha siqib yuboriladigan funksional jihatdan muhim farqlarni, jumladan ta’sir ko‘rsatuvchi va qo‘llab-quvvatlovchi o‘zaro ta’sirni, texnik qurilish va me’yoriy ijroni, shuningdek biznesni kengaytirish va tranzaksion taqsimotni ajratib ko‘rsatadi. Mazkur maqola sof kontseptual xarakterga ega bo‘lib, WBCI javob beradigan nazariy bo‘shliqlarni, konstruktsiya chegaralarini, mavjud modellar bilan qiyosiy munosabatini va kelgusidagi verifikatsiya yo‘llarini tizimli ravishda bayon qiladi. WBCI kasbiy baholash, karyera maslahatlari, mutaxassislik tanlash va kasbiy moslashtirish uchun madaniy jihatdan chuqurroq singdirilgan, tuzilmasi aniqroq va amaliy jihatdan qulayroq nazariy asosni taqdim etadi.
Kalit so‘zlar:
kasbiy qiziqishlar nazariy qurilish Xitoy madaniy muhiti karyera rivojlanishiBibliografik manbalar
Corley, K.G. and Gioia, D.A. (2011) ‘Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?’, Academy of Management Review, 36(1), pp. 12–32.
Holland, J.L. (1997) Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. 3rd edn. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D. and Hackett, G. (1994) ‘Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), pp. 79–122.
Li, J., Xu, C., Li, C. and Zhang, H. (2018) ‘Construction of vocational interests scale for young Chinese’, Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, e15.
Nauta, M.M. (2010) ‘The development, evolution, and status of Holland’s theory of vocational personalities: Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), pp. 11–22.
Prediger, D.J. (1982) ‘Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations?’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21(3), pp. 259–287.
Rounds, J. and Su, R. (2014) ‘The nature and power of interests’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), pp. 98–103.
Su, R. (2020) ‘The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103240.
Su, R., Tay, L., Liao, H.-Y., Zhang, Q. and Rounds, J. (2019) ‘Toward a dimensional model of vocational interests’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), pp. 690–714.
Tracey, T.J.G. (2002) ‘Personal globe inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and competence beliefs’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), pp. 113–172.
Tracey, T.J.G. and Rounds, J. (1996) ‘The spherical representation of vocational interests’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(1), pp. 3–41.
Whetten, D.A. (1989) ‘What constitutes a theoretical contribution?’, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 490–495.
