A NEW THEORETICAL CONSTRUCTION OF VOCATIONAL INTERESTS IN THE CHINESE CULTURAL CONTEXT: THE WBCI SIX-DIMENSIONAL HIERARCHICAL MODEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2026-vol4-iss4-pp298-306Abstract
Vocational interest theory has long been dominated by Holland’s RIASEC model. Although its simplicity, interpretability, and practical usefulness remain influential, its broad-band categories are increasingly unable to capture finer-grained differences in contemporary occupational structures and non-Western cultural contexts. This article proposes the WBCI six-dimensional hierarchical model, composed of six first-order dimensions and twelve second-order factors, to reflect the Chinese cultural context and occupational ecology. The model highlights functionally important distinctions that are often compressed in traditional classifications, such as influential interaction versus supportive interaction, technical construction versus normative execution, and business expansion versus transactional allocation. This purely conceptual article systematically clarifies the theoretical gaps addressed by WBCI, its construct boundaries, its comparative relationship with existing models, and its future validation path. WBCI provides a theoretically clearer, more culturally embedded, and more operational framework for vocational assessment, career counseling, major selection, and occupational matching.
Keywords:
vocational interests theory construction Chinese cultural context career developmentReferences
Corley, K.G. and Gioia, D.A. (2011) ‘Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution?’, Academy of Management Review, 36(1), pp. 12–32.
Holland, J.L. (1997) Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments. 3rd edn. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Lent, R.W., Brown, S.D. and Hackett, G. (1994) ‘Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), pp. 79–122.
Li, J., Xu, C., Li, C. and Zhang, H. (2018) ‘Construction of vocational interests scale for young Chinese’, Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, 12, e15.
Nauta, M.M. (2010) ‘The development, evolution, and status of Holland’s theory of vocational personalities: Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology’, Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), pp. 11–22.
Prediger, D.J. (1982) ‘Dimensions underlying Holland’s hexagon: Missing link between interests and occupations?’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 21(3), pp. 259–287.
Rounds, J. and Su, R. (2014) ‘The nature and power of interests’, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(2), pp. 98–103.
Su, R. (2020) ‘The three faces of interests: An integrative review of interest research in vocational, organizational, and educational psychology’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 116, 103240.
Su, R., Tay, L., Liao, H.-Y., Zhang, Q. and Rounds, J. (2019) ‘Toward a dimensional model of vocational interests’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(5), pp. 690–714.
Tracey, T.J.G. (2002) ‘Personal globe inventory: Measurement of the spherical model of interests and competence beliefs’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60(1), pp. 113–172.
Tracey, T.J.G. and Rounds, J. (1996) ‘The spherical representation of vocational interests’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 48(1), pp. 3–41.
Whetten, D.A. (1989) ‘What constitutes a theoretical contribution?’, Academy of Management Review, 14(4), pp. 490–495.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









