ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN UZBEKISTAN BASED ON INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL EDUCATION STANDARDS AND IMPROVING METHODOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2026-vol4-iss6-pp142-148

Abstract

In recent years, distance learning has become an integral part of Uzbekistan’s education system, yet a unified methodological framework for assessing its quality against international norms has not been established. This article proposes an analytical model for assessing distance learning quality based on international digital education standards (ISO/IEC 40180, ISO 21001, IMS Global/1EdTech, SCORM and xAPI, Quality Matters, OpenupEd, and the European Standards and Guidelines — ESG). The model is expressed as an integral quality index (SI) combining six dimensions: content and curriculum quality, instructional design, technological infrastructure and interoperability, learner support and engagement, assessment and learning outcomes, and quality management. The study draws on a systematic review of the literature, a comparative analysis of international standards, and secondary data. The analysis shows that national distance learning platforms (EDUUZ, the digital resources of IT-Park University) are advancing rapidly in content and technology but lag behind international norms in instructional design, learning analytics, and continuous quality management. A continuous-improvement mechanism is proposed that links quality assessment with methodological management. The findings are of practical value to educational institutions, accreditation bodies, and regulators.

Keywords:

distance learning education quality international digital standards quality management methodological management learning analytics ISO/IEC 40180 Uzbekistan

References

Bates A.W. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. – Vancouver: Tony Bates Associates.

EADTU (2016). OpenupEd Quality Label for MOOCs. – Maastricht: European Association of Distance Teaching Universities.

ENQA (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). – Brussels.

IMS Global Learning Consortium (2021). Caliper Analytics Specification, v1.2. – Lake Mary, FL: 1EdTech.

ISO (2018). ISO 21001:2018. Educational organizations — Management systems for educational organizations — Requirements with guidance for use. – Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

ISO/IEC (2017). ISO/IEC 40180:2017. Information technology — Quality for learning, education and training — Fundamentals and reference framework. – Geneva: ISO/IEC.

OECD (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021. – Paris: OECD Publishing.

Patrinos H.A., Iqbal S.A. (2025). Learning during the pandemic: Evidence from Uzbekistan. // Prospects, World Bank Education Working Paper.

Quality Matters (2023). Higher Education Course Design Rubric, 7th ed. – Annapolis, MD: Quality Matters.

Sharif Nia H., Marôco J., She L. et al. (2023). Student satisfaction and academic efficacy during online learning with the mediating effect of student engagement: A multi-country study. // PLOS ONE, 18(10), e0285315.

UNESCO (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report : Technology in education. – Paris: UNESCO.

World Bank (2024). Uzbekistan: Human Capital and Digital Education Review. – Washington, DC: World Bank.

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2020-yil 5-oktabrdagi PF-6079-son Farmoni «Raqamli Oʻzbekiston — 2030» strategiyasi toʻgʻrisida.

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2022-yil 3-oktabrdagi 559-son qarori «Oliy taʼlim muassasalarida masofaviy taʼlimni tashkil etish tartibi toʻgʻrisida».

ADL Initiative (2017). xAPI (Experience API) Specification, v1.0.3. – Alexandria, VA: Advanced Distributed Learning.

ADL Initiative (2009). SCORM 2004, 4th Edition. – Alexandria, VA: Advanced Distributed Learning.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Yaxshiboyev, R. (2026). ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN UZBEKISTAN BASED ON INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL EDUCATION STANDARDS AND IMPROVING METHODOLOGICAL MANAGEMENT MECHANISMS . Economic Development and Analysis, 4(6), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2026-vol4-iss6-pp142-148