DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN UZBEKISTAN: REFORM PHASES, PLATFORMIZATION, AND PUBLIC SERVICE MODERNIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2026-vol4-iss3-pp9-18Abstract
Uzbekistan has accelerated the digitalization of public services through legal reforms, infrastructure investments, and the expansion of unified service channels. However, international research shows that simply increasing the service catalog does not lead to meaningful transformation unless back-office interoperability, data governance, and user-centered design help reduce document burdens and procedural uncertainties. This paper presents a three-wave maturity model of Uzbekistan’s progress: (1) establishing basic infrastructure and internal digitization; (2) platform development and hybrid service delivery via a unified portal and one-stop shops; and (3) moving toward data-driven, proactive services based on life events. Using qualitative analysis of documents, institutional mapping, and benchmarking against OECD/UN/World Bank frameworks, the study links each stage’s enablers to expected outcomes like efficiency, transparency, and inclusion, as well as key risks such as data quality issues, interagency coordination gaps, cybersecurity and privacy threats, and uneven adoption. An analytical matrix highlights priority policy actions, including clearer data stewardship, enforceable interoperability standards, security-by-design, and institutionalized user experience (UX) standards integrated into administrative procedures and remedy mechanisms. Lessons from India’s digital public infrastructure show how reusable core components can accelerate scaling while also heightening governance requirements for accountability and trust.
Keywords:
digital government e-government public service digitization platform government interoperability user experienceReferences
Avazov, S. (2022). Exploring the determinants of intention to use e-government services in Uzbekistan. Journal of Political Science & Public Affairs, 37(3), 15-30.
Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ). (2024). Assessing the level of user satisfaction with public service centers and determining the most significant problem areas of public service delivery (Report).
Ergashov, J. K. (2022). Development of e-government in the Republic of Uzbekistan. CHRONOS: Multidisciplinary Sciences, 6(3/65).
Kuldosheva, G. (2021). Challenges and opportunities of digital transformation in the public sector in transition economies: Examination of the case of Uzbekistan (ADBI Working Paper No. 1248). Asian Development Bank Institute. https://www.adb.org/publications/challenges-opportunities-digital-transformation-uzbekistan
MeitY. (2023). Digital India. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/
National e-Governance Division. (2023). DigiLocker. Government of India. https://www.digilocker.gov.in/
National e-Governance Division. (2023). UMANG: Unified Mobile Application for New-age Governance. Government of India. https://www.umang.gov.in/
National Payments Corporation of India. (2024). Unified Payments Interface (UPI): Product overview. https://www.npci.org.in/what-we-do/upi/product-overview
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). Recommendation of the Council on digital government strategies.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2020). The OECD digital government policy framework: Six dimensions of a digital government.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). OECD public governance reviews: Uzbekistan-Towards a more modern, effective and strategic public administration. OECD Publishing.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2015). Law No. LRU-395: On the electronic government.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2018). Law No. LRU-457: On administrative procedures.
Republic of Uzbekistan. (2020). Presidential Decree No. DP-6079: On approval of the Strategy “Digital Uzbekistan-2030” and measures for its effective implementation.
Unique Identification Authority of India. (2024). Aadhaar ecosystem overview.
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2024). United Nations e-government survey 2024: Accelerating digital transformation for sustainable development.
World Bank. (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends.
World Bank. (2022). GovTech maturity index: 2022 update.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









