THE IMPACT OF ESG DISCLOSURE ON BANK PROFITABILITY AND MARKET VALUE IN EMERGING ECONOMIES: THE CASE OF UZBEKISTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/2992-877X-2025-vol3-iss12-pp128-146Abstract
This study investigates the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on bank profitability and market value in Uzbekistan an underexplored emerging economy in Central Asia undergoing rapid financial and sustainability reforms. Using a panel dataset of 22 commercial banks from 2015 to 2024, we construct a hand-collected ESG disclosure index through systematic content analysis of annual and sustainability reports, supplemented by financial data from the Central Bank of Uzbekistan. Net profit margin serves as the primary measure of profitability, while Tobin’s Q and market capitalization proxy for market value. Employing fixed effects, random effects, and System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimators to address endogeneity and unobserved heterogeneity, we find that higher ESG disclosure is significantly associated with improved bank profitability. Notably, this relationship is driven almost exclusively by the governance (G) pillar, while environmental (E) and social (S) disclosures show no statistically significant effects highlighting the context-specific materiality of ESG dimensions in transitional economies. Robustness checks, including lagged specifications, sub-sample analyses by ownership type, and alternative ESG measures, confirm the reliability of our findings. The results suggest that in Uzbekistan’s institutional environment characterized by ongoing corporate governance reforms and nascent green finance infrastructure transparency in board oversight, risk management, and anti-corruption mechanisms enhances operational efficiency and stakeholder trust, thereby boosting net margins. Our study contributes to the limited literature on ESG-finance linkages in Central Asia and challenges universalist assumptions about ESG materiality by demonstrating that governance remains the most financially relevant pillar in early-stage reform contexts. The findings carry important implications for regulators, bank managers, and international investors: prioritizing credible governance disclosure offers a strategic pathway to both financial performance and market legitimacy. As Uzbekistan advances its National Strategy for Green Economy Development, this research provides empirical grounding for sequenced, institutionally attuned ESG integration in the banking sector.
Keywords:
ESG disclosure bank profitability net profit margin governance (G) pillar emerging economies sustainable finance financial performance corporate governance green bankingReferences
Arayssi, M., Jizi, M., & Tabaja, H. (2020). The effect of ESG performance on bank profitability: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 10(4), 355–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2020.1755210
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Central Bank of Uzbekistan. (2023). Green finance roadmap and sustainability reporting guidelines. Tashkent: Author.
Chapple, L., Chatterjee, S., & Werner, T. (2021). ESG and financial performance: Evidence from BRICS banks. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 12(5), 987–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-01-2021-0023
Dhaliwal, D. S., et al. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The case of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.05868
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Godfrey, J. M., Merrill, C. B., & O’Donovan, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and bank valuation in Europe: The moderating role of regulatory pressure. European Financial Management, 28(2), 432–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12310
Gómez-Bezares, F., Gómez-Bezares, C., & Vargas-Hidalgo, L. (2022). ESG performance and financial outcomes in Latin American banks. Emerging Markets Review, 52, 100912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2022.100912
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.12.002
Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986–1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9512080033
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51396
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 75(4), 41–51.
Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2021). Governance disclosure and bank performance: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 69, 101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101628
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268–305. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556659
Nguyen, T. T., Ntim, C. G., & Malagila, J. (2020). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from ASEAN. Journal of Business Ethics, 166(4), 785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04159-3
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Tang, D. Y., & Luo, Y. (2022). ESG reporting in state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 74, 102203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2022.102203
UNEP Finance Initiative. (2019). Principles for Responsible Banking. United Nations Environment Programme. https://www.unepfi.org/banking/principles-for-responsible-banking/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.









