THE LANGUAGE OF FINTECH: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PERSUASION AND FRAMING IN FINANCIAL INNOVATION

Authors

  • Kwame Nkrumah University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60078/2026-vol5-iss2-pp312-323

Abstract

 This research takes a closer look at the language used by the financial technology sector, moving beyond traditional economic analyses to understand how words persuade and frame our perception of money in the digital age. It deconstructs the text found on fintech platforms, from the catchy slogans on websites to the dense paragraphs in user agreements, using two powerful linguistic lenses: Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and Conceptual Metaphor Theory. To do this, a substantial collection of text, or corpus, was assembled from robo-advisors, cryptocurrency websites, and buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) services. The analysis then identified recurring patterns, such as dominant metaphors and the tone of the language used. The findings reveal that fintech communication is a carefully crafted tool. It consistently employs metaphors of simplicity, like investing, simplified, and empowerment, such as take control, to gently guide user behavior. However, this encouraging language often exists in stark contrast to the complex, risk-laden clauses buried in terms of service, which are frequently written in a detached, legalistic style. The very word innovation itself is shown to carry a positive weight that can sometimes deflect ethical questions. The study concludes with a call for action, recommending clearer language standards set by regulators, better training for developers in ethical communication, and the adoption of linguistic audits to catch potentially manipulative language. Ultimately, this paper argues that financial innovation is not just a technological feat but a deeply linguistic one, demanding careful and interdisciplinary scrutiny. 

References

Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.).

Routledge.

Financial Stability Board (FSB). (2019). FinTech and market structure in financial services:

Market developments and potential financial stability implications. https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/P140219.pdf

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and gender in business media discourse: A critical cognitive study.

Lagna, A. (2022). The discursive power of fintech: Reification, Othering, and the disruption of banking. New Political Economy, 27(4), 571–585.

Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2019). Diversifying finance research: From financialization to sustainability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 62, 277–293.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Loewenstein, G. (2005). Hot-cold empathy gaps and medical decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S49–S56.

O’Mara-Shimek, M., Guillén-Parra, M., & Ortega-Larrea, A. (2015). Stop the war: The discourse of pacifism in business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(S2), S128–S144.

Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words indiscourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.

Thakor, A. V. (2020). Fintech and banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 41, 100833.

Thaler, R. H. (2015). Misbehaving: The making of behavioral economics. W.W. Norton & Company.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. Yale University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin

(Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 466–485). John Wiley & Sons.

Vives, X. (2019). Digital disruption in banking. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 11, 243–272

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

THE LANGUAGE OF FINTECH: A DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF PERSUASION AND FRAMING IN FINANCIAL INNOVATION. (2026). Editions, 5(2), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.60078/2026-vol5-iss2-pp312-323