FORMATION OF A TERRITORIALLY-ORIENTED MECHANISM FOR FINANCING INNOVATION ACTIVITY BASED ON TARGETED TAX DEDUCTIONS OF ENTERPRISES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss3-pp706-714Abstract
The article substantiates a territorially-oriented mechanism for financing innovation activity based on targeted deductions of enterprises from the corporate profit tax. The relevance of the study stems from the high territorial concentration of the innovation potential of the Republic of Uzbekistan in the capital region against the background of low innovation activity of enterprises in the regions. The author proposes the formation of local territorial innovation funds at the district level through the redistribution of 1 % of the enterprises' profit tax without increasing the aggregate tax burden. Based on official statistics on 12,239 enterprises of the Syrdarya region, the potential volume of the funds is estimated by districts and economic sectors. The procedures of fund formation, governance and allocation are described; the model is compared with international analogues (Hungary, Brazil, the USA) and with the cluster model of innovation development; advantages, risks and ways to mitigate them are assessed
Keywords:
innovation activity territorial innovation fund corporate profit tax targeted tax deductions regional innovation gap decentralization of financing Syrdarya regionReferences
Act CXXVI of 1996 on the Use of a Specified Portion of Personal Income Tax According to the Designation of the Taxpayer (Hungary). — Budapest, 1996.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.
Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (2004). Knowledge Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation. In Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics (Vol. 4, pp. 2713–2739). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL). Percentage Tax Designation Mechanisms: Case Studies. — URL: https://ecnl.org (дата обращения: 18.06.2026).
Financing Innovation in Brazil (2020) // Global Innovation Index 2020. — Geneva: WIPO, – Ch. 10. – URL: https://www.wipo.int (дата обращения: 18.06.2026).
Hall, B. H., & Van Reenen, J. (2000). How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review of the Evidence. Research Policy, 29(4–5), 449–469. Авторы делают вывод, что в среднем один доллар налоговой льготы стимулирует примерно один доллар дополнительных расходов на НИОКР.
Inter-American Development Bank. (2026) Enhancing technological innovation in Brazil. — URL: https://www.iadb.org (дата обращения: 18.06.2026).
Oates, W. E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149.
Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–90.
Tax Increment Financing (2026) // Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. — URL: https://www.lincolninst.edu (дата обращения: 18.06.2026).
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
What is Tax Increment Financing (TIF) (2026) // Good Jobs First. — URL: https://goodjobsfirst.org (дата обращения: 18.06.2026).
Агентство статистики при Президенте Республики Узбекистан. (2026) Количество предприятий и организаций по Сырдарьинской области (без дехканских и фермерских хозяйств, по состоянию на 1 января 2026 г.). –Ташкент.
Анализ научно-технического и инновационного потенциала регионов Республики Узбекистан// (2020) Центр научно-технической информации при Министерстве Инновационного развития Республики Узбекистан.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
