INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES, RISK GRADIENT, AND VALUE CO-CREATION: A STUDY ON CHINA’S TOURISM INVESTMENT ALLOCATION STRATEGIES FOR THE GLOBAL SOUTH

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss2-pp521-531

Abstract

Driven by geopolitical reconfigurations, tourism investment in the Global South is shifting from volume-based expansion to risk-centric decision-making. This study synthesizes institutional theory, the resource-based view, and the Social License to Operate (SLO) to assess this transition. Leveraging panel data from 18 Belt and Road countries (2019–2024), we construct an assessment system across three dimensions: institutional quality, macroeconomic stability, and developmental maturity. Using the entropy weight method, we identify a distinct risk gradient: Africa exhibits the highest risk intensity, followed by Central Asia and Central and Eastern Europe, with Southeast Asia being the most stable. Exchange rate volatility and political instability emerge as primary systemic drivers, though Southeast Asia shows consistent risk abatement. Finally, we operationalize a "risk-capability-strategy" framework, proposing differentiated regional allocation strategies to navigate the Global South’s evolving investment landscape

Keywords:

Global South tourism investment risk assessment entropy weight method regional allocation

References

Ardiansyah, M., et al. (2024). Achieving sustainable competitiveness of tourism dynamics with resource-based view. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(3), 1001-1023.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.

Boutilier, R. G., & Thomson, I. (2011). Modelling stakeholder association and business community relations: The case of the social license to operate. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Corporate Social Responsibility.

Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308-324.

Lai, F. F., & Xie, C. W. (2023). "Belt and Road" tourism safety research: Hotspots, review, and prospects. China Ecotourism, 13(6), 976-991.

Nguyen, H. D., Dang, C. N., Le-Hoai, L., et al. (2023). Exploratory analysis of legal risk causes in tourism real estate projects in emerging economies: Empirical study from Vietnam. International Journal of Construction Management, 23(5), 830-842.

Qiu, R., Wang, Y. D., Zhang, L. R., et al. (2024). A decade of tourism cooperation between China and Belt and Road countries: Review and prospect. In R. Song & Z. Jin (Eds.), Analysis and forecast of China's tourism development 2023–2024 (Green Book of Tourism). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 158-175.

Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Wei , Z. (2026). INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES, RISK GRADIENT, AND VALUE CO-CREATION: A STUDY ON CHINA’S TOURISM INVESTMENT ALLOCATION STRATEGIES FOR THE GLOBAL SOUTH. Advanced Economics and Pedagogical Technologies, 3(2), 521-531. https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss2-pp521-531