METHODOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ASSESSING DIGITAL GOVERNANCE IN JOINT-STOCK COMPANIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss2-pp289-295Abstract
This article examines the economic essence of digital governance in joint-stock companies, with a particular focus on banks operating under conditions of institutional and technological transformation. The study argues that digital governance should not be reduced to automation or IT adoption, but should be interpreted as a data-driven management system influencing decision quality, risk management, compliance, and financial stability. Using a systematic and comparative approach, the limitations of macro-level indices such as DESI and EGDI are identified in assessing corporate governance effectiveness. To address this gap, the paper proposes an integrated author’s indicator system and an integral evaluation model linking digital governance maturity with economic and risk-related outcomes. The findings provide a methodological basis for empirical analysis and practical application in banking governance
Keywords:
digital governance joint-stock companies banking sector data-driven management performance evaluationReferences
Bank for International Settlements (BIS) (2021). Principles for operational resilience. Basel: BIS.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) (2015). Corporate governance principles for banks. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.
Davenport, T.H. and Harris, J.G. (2017). Competing on analytics: The new science of winning. 2nd ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Deloitte (2021). Digital maturity models in financial services. London: Deloitte Insights.
European Commission (2023). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI) 2023. Brussels: European Commission.
Ilyin, I.V., Levina, A.I. and Dubrovsky, V.Z. (2019). Digital transformation of corporate governance systems. Journal of Institutional Studies, 11(3), pp. 45–59.
Irmuxamedov, A.A. (2025). Raqamli iqtisodiyot sharoitida korporativ boshqaruv transformatsiyasi. Iqtisodiyot va innovatsion texnologiyalar, 2, pp. 55–67.
Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D. and Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not technology, drives digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 14(1), pp. 1–25.
Makarov, V.L. (2020). Digital economy and management transformation. Economic Issues, 6, pp. 23–34.
Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. and Tarantola, S. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. Paris: OECD.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy banki (2020–2024). Bank tizimini raqamlashtirishga oid me’yoriy hujjatlar va hisobotlar. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Markaziy banki.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti (2020). “Raqamli O‘zbekiston – 2030” strategiyasi. PF–6079-son, 5-oktabr.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti (2022). “2022–2026 yillarga mo‘ljallangan Yangi O‘zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi”. PF–60-son, 28-yanvar.
United Nations (2022). United Nations E-Government Survey 2022. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D. and McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
