ESG INNOVATION AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STATE-OWNED VS PRIVATE BANKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2025-vol2-iss6-pp33-47

Abstract

This study investigates the role of ESG-driven innovation as a strategic source of competitive advantage in the banking sector, with a comparative focus on state-owned and private banks across emerging and developed markets. Drawing on the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capabilities theory, it develops a novel ESG Innovation Index that captures the depth and integration of sustainability technologies, such as AI-based ESG analytics, carbon tracking platforms, and digital reporting systems into core banking functions. Using a panel dataset of 68 banks from Central Asia and benchmark economies (2015–2024), the study employs fixed-effects and system GMM models to assess the impact of ESG innovation on profitability (ROA, ROE), operational efficiency, market share, and investor attractiveness. Results reveal that ESG innovation significantly enhances financial and operational performance, while the magnitude of its impact is substantially higher among private banks. The findings highlight that ownership structure moderates the innovation–performance nexus, with private banks leveraging technological agility for greater returns, whereas state-owned banks tend to pursue compliance-oriented sustainability agendas. The research contributes to strategic management and sustainable finance literature by framing ESG innovation as a contingent dynamic capability and offers policy insights for regulators seeking to balance innovation incentives across ownership types.

Keywords:

ESG innovation competitive advantage state-owned banks private banks sustainable finance resource-based view Central Asia green fintech dynamic capabilities

References

AIFC (Astana International Financial Centre) (2022). Green Finance Roadmap for Kazakhstan 2022–2025. Astana: AIFC Green Finance Centre.

Arner, D.W., Barberis, J. and Buckley, R.P. (2022). Sustainable finance and fintech: Foundations, applications, and challenges. Geneva: International Centre for Financial Regulation.

Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp.99–120.

Berger, A.N., Klapper, L. and Turk-Ariss, R. (2020). Corporate governance, ownership structure, and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 48, 100736.

Berger, A.N., Roman, R.A. and Zomlossy, N. (2020). Do environmental, social, and governance activities affect bank performance and risk? Evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 117, 105836.

Central Bank of Uzbekistan (CBU) (2023). Guidelines on ESG risk management for commercial banks. Tashkent: CBU.

Chen, S., Tang, Q. and Wang, Y. (2021). Ownership structure and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 68, 101576.

EBRD (European Bank for Reconstruction and Development) (2023). Sustainable finance in Central Asia: Progress and challenges. London: EBRD.

Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

Gomber, P., Koch, J. and Siering, M. (2023). Digital sustainability in financial services: A research agenda. Electronic Markets, 33(1), pp.1–22.

Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2017). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 11-045.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (2002). Investor protection and corporate valuation. The Journal of Finance, 57(3), pp.1147–1170.

Marquis, C., Toffel, M.W. and Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), pp.484–504.

Megginson, W.L. and Netter, J.M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(2), pp.321–389.

PCAF (Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials) (2020). Global GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry. Amsterdam: PCAF.

Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories, relationships, and determinants. Organization & Environment, 24(4), pp.404–433.

Teece, D.J., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), pp.509–533.

World Bank (2018). *World Bank raises $45 million with blockchain-based bond*. Press Release, August 23. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Jalalov, M. (2025). ESG INNOVATION AS A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF STATE-OWNED VS PRIVATE BANKS. Advanced Economics and Pedagogical Technologies, 2(6), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2025-vol2-iss6-pp33-47