This article analyzes the economic, legal, and methodological foundations of the business entity stability rating system developed under Uzbekistan’s regulatory framework. The rating indicators are reviewed in comparison with international practices and evaluated in the context of digital fiscal governance and tax discipline. Practical challenges in the system are identified, and improvement recommendations are proposed. The study provides theoretical insights and policy suggestions aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of fiscal reforms in Uzbekistan.

This article analyzes the legal foundations, methodology and initial results of implementing the stability rating system for business entities in Uzbekistan. The aim of the study is to explain the essence of the rating system, to identify changes in the assessment criteria and to determine their impact on tax compliance and the stability of the business environment. Methodologically, the research employs descriptive and analytical analysis, a comparative approach based on international experience, diagnostic assessment and digital monitoring techniques. The empirical base relies on the information systems of the State Tax Committee, official statistical data and national regulatory acts. The findings show that, after the introduction of the stability rating, there has been a significant increase in timely tax payments, on-time submission of tax reports, the use of electronic invoices, overall employment and the employment of socially vulnerable groups. Furthermore, the paper substantiates that calculating the rating on the basis of 30-day average scores and introducing new incentive and penalty indicators have enhanced the transparency of the system and expanded the possibilities for selective fiscal management. The author proposes further improvement of the rating system, taking into account sectoral and regional specificities, as well as its more active use in the practices of banks, investors and public procurement.

The reforms being implemented today increase the responsibility of local governments for the timely financing of priority expenses and activities for the socio-economic development of regions, do not implement activities with unclear sources, and also contribute to the further tightening of budget discipline, budget revenues and expenditures. forecasts of its deficit, sources of financing the deficit. Requires improvement of information about the main directions of fiscal policy, analysis of macro-fiscal risks and public debt.