Modern financial science pays considerable attention to the study of the impact of fiscal policy on social development. The quality and timeliness of decision-making on the formation and implementation of budget policy affect the balance of public finances, the level of effectiveness of state regulation of socio-economic processes. Budgetary policy affects the effectiveness of financial and economic transformations in the public finance system, provides financing for the structural restructuring of the economy, stimulating the development of its priority sectors, accelerating the intensification of production and the level of development of society.
The article focuses on the importance of public finance in a market economy, reflects the essence of the reforms carried out by the government of developed foreign countries in the field of improving the efficiency of public finance management at the current stage of the economy, analyzes the results of the rating conducted by international financial organizations in the field of openness of budget indicators. The analysis showed that the promising foreign experience in public finance management is the active introduction of results-based budgeting, the development of a model for evaluating the effectiveness of public finance management, the formation of fiscal rules, improving budget planning, increasing budget transparency, etc.
This article investigates the advantages of results-oriented budgeting over other methods and examines the application of this method in practice. It has been proposed that the implementation of results-oriented budgeting should not be considered in isolation, but rather in the context of public expenditure management reform and, more broadly, within the framework of public sector reform, including civil service reform, institutional reform, and change management. The study explores the view that results-oriented budgeting represents a system of budget formation (and execution) that reflects the relationship between planned (implemented) budget expenditures and expected (achieved) results.
This article analyzes the regulatory legal framework related to the National Sustainable Development Goals (NSDG) and evaluates the current state of budget expenditure tagging aligned with these goals. It highlights potential challenges in tagging budget expenditures to correspond with the NSDG and proposes recommendations for implementing a structured tagging procedure. Additionally, the article emphasizes the importance of integrating the tagging process with specific tasks under the NSDG framework, rather than focusing solely on overarching goals. This approach facilitates data-driven decision-making by enabling targeted allocation of funds, identifying NSDG areas that require additional financing, and assessing the effectiveness of expenditures. Examples are provided to illustrate how task-oriented tagging enhances budget planning and resource utilization.
The article is devoted to the analysis of strategies and methods aimed at optimizing taxation within the framework of the digital economy. In the context of the rapidly developing digital market and the emergence of new forms of commercial activity, effective tax planning is becoming the main aspect of the state's financial stability. The article covers the use of digital technologies in the harmonization of tax legislation, data collection and analysis. Particular attention is paid to the development of effective tax collection mechanisms for digital transactions and services, which are the main factor for ensuring stable and predictable government revenues.
