INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY AND DIGITAL READING ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM POST-SOVIET TRANSITION ECONOMIES USING PISA 2022

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss3-pp579-587

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between students' perceptions of instructional quality and their digital reading performance across seven post-Soviet countries using PISA 2022 data (N = 56,477 students; 2,495 schools). Drawing on Klieme et al.'s instructional quality framework—encompassing instructional approaches, classroom management, and supportive climate—three-level hierarchical linear models (HLM) were estimated. Results indicate that perceived instructional adaptation (β = 0.109), teacher-directed instruction (β = 0.076), digital skills teaching practices (β = 0.230), and stimulation of reading engagement (β = 0.123) were significantly and positively associated with digital reading outcomes. A favorable disciplinary climate (β = 0.031), teacher interest (β = 0.073), and teacher support (β = 0.054) also contributed positively. Conversely, reading skill exercises (β = −0.051) and extended instructional time (β = −0.054) showed small negative associations. School-level variance explained a large share of outcome variability (f² = 44.77%), underscoring the institutional role in shaping digital literacy. The findings extend instructional quality research to transitional education systems and provide actionable implications for pedagogy and education policy in post-Soviet contexts

Keywords:

instructional quality digital reading literacy PISA 2022 hierarchical linear modeling post-Soviet education secondary education

References

Capin, P., Roberts, G., Clemens, N. H., & Vaughn, S. (2022). When treatment adherence matters: Interactions among treatment adherence, instructional quality, and student characteristics on reading outcomes. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(2), 753-774.

Feingold, A. (2013). A regression framework for effect size assessments in longitudinal modeling of group differences. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 111–121.

Hu, B. Y., & Wang, C. (2022). Instructional quality and digital reading performance among 15-year-old students: A multilevel analysis of PISA 2018 OECD data. Computers & Education, 177, 104374.

Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. In T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp. 137–160). Waxmann.

Leino, K., Nissinen, K., & Sirén, M. (2022). Associations between teacher quality, instructional quality and student reading outcomes in Nordic PIRLS 2016 data. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 10(1), 25.

Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. D. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O'Connell & D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel modeling of educational data (pp. 59–110). Information Age Publishing.

Niu, Z., Yang, X., & Li, Q. (2025). Instructional quality and student outcomes in post-Soviet contexts: A cross-national analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 130, 102445.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volumes I–III): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Wiley.

Wang, J., Tigelaar, D. E., Luo, J., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Teacher beliefs, classroom process quality, and student engagement in the smart classroom learning environment: A multilevel analysis. Computers & Education, 183, 104501.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., Dresel, M., & Daumiller, M. (2020). Obtaining secondary students’ perceptions of instructional quality: Two-level structure and measurement invariance. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101303.

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Khadjieva , I. (2026). INSTRUCTIONAL QUALITY AND DIGITAL READING ACHIEVEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM POST-SOVIET TRANSITION ECONOMIES USING PISA 2022. Advanced Economics and Pedagogical Technologies, 3(3), 579-587. https://doi.org/10.60078/3060-4842-2026-vol3-iss3-pp579-587